Home Blog Tools Comparison DynamoDB vs Redis: Choosing Between a NoSQL Database and In-Memory Cache
Tools Comparison

DynamoDB vs Redis: Choosing Between a NoSQL Database and In-Memory Cache

March 6, 2025 By Orlando Adeyemi 12 min read
DynamoDB vs Redis: Choosing Between a NoSQL Database and In-Memory Cache

DynamoDB vs Redis: Choosing Between a NoSQL Database and In-Memory Cache

Selecting the right data storage solution is crucial for application performance, scalability, and cost-effectiveness. Amazon DynamoDB and Redis are two popular options that often come up in this conversation, but they serve fundamentally different purposes.

In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll explore the differences between DynamoDB (a persistent NoSQL database) and Redis (an in-memory data store), helping you understand when to use each and how they can work together.

Technology Overview: DynamoDB vs Redis

FeatureAmazon DynamoDBRedis
TypeFully managed NoSQL databaseIn-memory data structure store
Primary UsePersistent data storageCaching, real-time data structures
Data LocationPersistent storage (SSDs)Primary in memory (with optional persistence)
LatencySingle-digit millisecondsMicroseconds
Data SizeVirtually unlimitedLimited by available memory
AWS ServiceNative DynamoDBElastiCache for Redis
Data StructuresKey-value, documentsStrings, lists, sets, sorted sets, hashes, streams

Understanding the Fundamental Difference

Before diving deeper, it’s important to understand that DynamoDB and Redis are designed for different primary purposes:

  • DynamoDB is a fully managed, serverless NoSQL database designed to be your application’s persistent data store, providing durable storage with consistent performance at any scale.

  • Redis is an in-memory data structure store often used as a cache, message broker, or for real-time data processing where ultra-low latency is critical. While Redis can persist data to disk, it’s primarily designed for data that fits in memory.

This fundamental difference drives many of the design choices and trade-offs in each system.

Performance Comparison

DynamoDB Performance

DynamoDB delivers consistent, single-digit millisecond response times at virtually any scale. Key performance characteristics include:

  • Latency typically ranges from 1-10ms for point operations
  • Automatic partitioning for horizontal scaling
  • Throughput limited by provisioned capacity or on-demand limits
  • Performance consistent regardless of data size
  • Optimized for key-based access patterns

While DynamoDB is extremely fast for a database, it is nonetheless bound by the laws of physics: data must be retrieved from storage (albeit very fast SSD storage).

Redis Performance

Redis operates primarily in memory, providing:

  • Microsecond latency (typically 100-500μs)
  • Up to 100x faster than DynamoDB for certain operations
  • Extremely high throughput for simple operations
  • Performance degrades if dataset exceeds available memory
  • Support for complex operations like set intersections in memory

Redis achieves this exceptional performance by keeping all data in RAM, making it ideal for use cases where absolute minimum latency is required.

Data Model & Capabilities

Dynomate: Modern DynamoDB GUI Client

Built for real developer workflows with AWS profile integration, multi-session support, and team collaboration.

AWS SSO support & multi-region browsing
Script-like operations with data chaining
Git-friendly local storage for team sharing

DynamoDB Data Model

DynamoDB uses a key-value and document data model:

  • Each item has a primary key (partition key and optional sort key)
  • Items can store attributes (similar to JSON)
  • Maximum item size of 400KB
  • Limited query capabilities (primarily key-based access)
  • Secondary indexes for additional access patterns
  • Transactions across multiple items

Redis Data Model

Redis offers a rich set of data structures:

  • Simple key-value storage (strings)
  • Lists for queues and stacks
  • Sets and sorted sets for unique collections and rankings
  • Hashes for field-value pairs
  • Bit arrays for space-efficient boolean operations
  • HyperLogLog for counting unique items
  • Streams for append-only log data
  • Geospatial indexes for location data

These specialized data structures enable Redis to efficiently solve problems that would be more complex with DynamoDB’s simpler model.

Use Cases: When to Choose Each

When to Use DynamoDB

DynamoDB is the right choice when you need:

  1. Persistent primary database: For storing critical application data that must be durable and survive restarts
  2. Large datasets: When your data exceeds available memory or grows unpredictably
  3. Automatic scaling: For applications with variable traffic without capacity planning
  4. ACID transactions: When you need atomic operations across multiple items
  5. Long-term data storage: For data that needs to be retained indefinitely
  6. Serverless architectures: When paired with AWS Lambda and other serverless services

Common DynamoDB use cases include:

  • User profiles and account data
  • Product catalogs
  • Game state and player data
  • Session management (where persistence is required)
  • Order history and transaction records
  • IoT device data

When to Use Redis

Redis excels when you need:

  1. Ultra-low latency: When microsecond response times matter
  2. Caching layer: To reduce database load and speed up responses
  3. Specialized data structures: For leaderboards, counters, pub/sub, etc.
  4. Real-time analytics: For fast-changing metrics and calculations
  5. Rate limiting: To control API usage with precise timing
  6. Message broker: For lightweight messaging between services

Common Redis use cases include:

  • Caching database query results
  • Session storage (where ultra-fast access is prioritized over persistence)
  • Real-time leaderboards and counting
  • Queues and job management
  • Rate limiting and request throttling
  • Real-time analytics dashboards

Persistence & Durability

DynamoDB Durability

DynamoDB is designed for durability:

  • Data automatically replicated across multiple AZs
  • Synchronous writes for durability
  • Point-in-time recovery (PITR) for backups
  • No data loss on server failures
  • 11 9’s of durability (99.999999999%)

Redis Persistence Options

Redis is primarily in-memory but offers persistence options:

  • RDB snapshots (point-in-time snapshots to disk)
  • AOF logs (append-only file logging all write operations)
  • Hybrid approaches (combining snapshots and logs)
  • ElastiCache Multi-AZ with automatic failover

Even with these options, Redis is typically not used as a system of record for critical data, as its persistence is a secondary feature rather than its primary design goal.

Scaling & Operational Considerations

DynamoDB Scaling

DynamoDB scaling is fully managed:

  • Automatic partitioning as data grows
  • No capacity planning required with on-demand mode
  • No operational overhead for scaling
  • Global tables for multi-region deployment
  • Storage scaled automatically

Redis Scaling

Redis scaling requires more consideration:

  • Vertical scaling by increasing instance size
  • Cluster mode for horizontal scaling (with resharding)
  • Read replicas for read scaling
  • Memory is the primary limiting factor
  • Requires explicit capacity planning

ElastiCache for Redis reduces some operational burden, but scaling Redis still requires more planning than DynamoDB.

Cost Considerations

DynamoDB Pricing

DynamoDB pricing is based on:

  • Provisioned capacity (RCUs/WCUs) or on-demand requests
  • Storage used
  • Optional features (PITR, global tables)
  • Data transfer

DynamoDB can scale down to very low costs for infrequently accessed data or even to zero with the free tier.

Redis Pricing

Redis (using ElastiCache) pricing is based on:

  • Node instance types and hours
  • Multi-AZ replication
  • Backup storage
  • Data transfer

Redis always has a baseline cost for running instances, even during idle periods, making it potentially more expensive for low-volume workloads.

The Hybrid Approach: Using DynamoDB and Redis Together

Familiar with these Dynamodb Challenges ?

  • Writing one‑off scripts for simple DynamoDB operations
  • Constantly switching between AWS profiles and regions
  • Sharing and managing database operations with your team

You should try Dynomate GUI Client for DynamoDB

  • Create collections of operations that work together like scripts
  • Seamless integration with AWS SSO and profile switching
  • Local‑first design with Git‑friendly sharing for team collaboration

One of the most powerful strategies is combining DynamoDB and Redis, leveraging the strengths of each:

  1. DynamoDB as primary datastore: Store your application’s persistent data in DynamoDB
  2. Redis as a caching layer: Cache frequently accessed DynamoDB data in Redis
  3. Redis for real-time operations: Use Redis for leaderboards, counters, and other real-time features
  4. DynamoDB for durability: Periodically persist critical Redis data to DynamoDB for backup

This approach can dramatically improve performance while maintaining data durability:

  • Reduce DynamoDB costs by lowering read requests
  • Achieve microsecond latency for cached data
  • Maintain durability for important information
  • Support specialized data structures when needed

Example hybrid architecture:

  • Store user profiles in DynamoDB
  • Cache active user profiles in Redis
  • Implement real-time leaderboards in Redis
  • Periodically save leaderboard snapshots to DynamoDB

Migration Considerations

When migrating between these technologies:

From Redis to DynamoDB:

  • Consider how to model Redis data structures in DynamoDB
  • Plan for potentially higher latency
  • Design access patterns around DynamoDB’s key-based model
  • Consider DAX if caching is still needed

From DynamoDB to Redis:

  • Ensure data fits in memory
  • Develop persistence strategy for critical data
  • Plan for scaling as data grows
  • Consider which Redis data structures best match your needs

Monitoring and Optimization

DynamoDB Monitoring

  • CloudWatch metrics for capacity, throttling, and latency
  • Cost Explorer for usage analysis
  • Use auto-scaling to automatically adjust capacity

Redis Monitoring

  • Memory usage and eviction rates
  • Connection counts
  • CPU utilization
  • Cache hit rates

Tools like Dynomate can help visualize and manage your DynamoDB data more effectively, while specialized Redis monitoring tools can provide insights into cache performance.

Conclusion: Making the Right Choice

Switching from Dynobase? Try Dynomate

Developers are switching to Dynomate for these key advantages:

Better Multi-Profile Support

  • Native AWS SSO integration
  • Seamless profile switching
  • Multiple accounts in a single view

Developer-Focused Workflow

  • Script-like operation collections
  • Chain data between operations
  • Full AWS API logging for debugging

Team Collaboration

  • Git-friendly collection sharing
  • No account required for installation
  • Local-first data storage for privacy

Privacy & Security

  • No account creation required
  • 100% local data storage
  • No telemetry or usage tracking

The choice between DynamoDB and Redis isn’t about which is better in absolute terms, but rather which better serves your specific needs:

  • Use DynamoDB when you need a durable, scalable database with consistent performance for your application’s persistent data.

  • Use Redis when you need microsecond latency, specialized data structures, or an effective caching layer.

  • Use both together to create a highly performant, scalable, and durable data architecture.

By understanding the strengths and limitations of each technology, you can make informed decisions that balance performance, cost, and operational complexity for your unique requirements.

Remember that both technologies excel in their respective domains, and the most effective architectures often leverage both for maximum benefit.

Ready to start working with DynamoDB more efficiently? Check out Dynomate, our professional GUI client that makes working with DynamoDB data and performance optimization significantly easier.

Share this article:

Related Articles