DynamoDB vs Firestore: Comparing AWS and Google Cloud NoSQL Databases

When building modern applications that require flexible, scalable NoSQL databases, Amazon DynamoDB and Google Cloud Firestore are two leading options. Both offer fully managed, highly available services but with different approaches to data modeling, real-time capabilities, and client integration.

This article provides a detailed comparison to help you understand the key differences and similarities between these popular NoSQL databases from competing cloud providers.

Overview: DynamoDB vs Firestore at a Glance

Feature	Amazon DynamoDB	Google Cloud Firestore
Cloud Platform	AWS	Google Cloud (part of Firebase)
Database Type	NoSQL key-value and document	NoSQL document-oriented
Data Model	Tables with items	Collections with documents
Real-time Updates	Via Streams (not client-facing)	Native client-facing listeners
Offline Support	None built-in	Native mobile/web client sync
Pricing Model	Provisioned or on-demand capacity	Operations-based pricing
Item Size Limit	400KB	1MB per document
Consistency Options	Eventually or strongly consistent	Strong consistency by default

Service Overview & Architecture

DynamoDB Architecture

Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed, serverless NoSQL database service that provides:

Fast, consistent performance at any scale
Automatic partitioning across storage nodes
Multi-region replication via Global Tables
Event-driven programming with DynamoDB Streams
Point-in-time recovery and continuous backups
Server-side encryption at rest

DynamoDB was designed as a backend database accessed primarily through server-side applications, though direct access from clients is possible with appropriate IAM permissions.

Firestore Architecture

Google Cloud Firestore (often referred to as Firebase Firestore) is a NoSQL document database with:

Real-time data synchronization
Offline support via client-side caching
Automatic multi-region replication
Built-in security rules at the document level
Deep integration with other Firebase services
Native mobile and web SDKs

Firestore was designed from the ground up to support direct access from client applications (web, iOS, Android) with a security model that doesn’t require a separate backend service for basic operations.

Data Model & Query Capabilities

Dynomate: Modern DynamoDB GUI Client

Built for real developer workflows with AWS profile integration, multi-session support, and team collaboration.

AWS SSO support & multi-region browsing

Script-like operations with data chaining

Git-friendly local storage for team sharing

Download Free Trial Compare GUI Clients

No account needed. Install and start using immediately.

Table browsing across regions
Flexible query & scan interface
AWS API logging & debugging

DynamoDB Data Model

DynamoDB uses a key-value store with document support:

Data is organized into tables
Each table contains items (similar to rows)
Items contain attributes (similar to fields or columns)
Each item must have a primary key, which can be:
- Simple primary key (single partition key)
- Composite primary key (partition key + sort key)
No enforced schema beyond the primary key
Maximum item size of 400KB

DynamoDB access patterns are heavily optimized around keys:

Get an item by its primary key
Query items with the same partition key
Query a range of sort key values
Use secondary indexes for alternate access patterns
Scan operations for full table scans (expensive)

Example DynamoDB item:

{
  "UserId": "user123",             // Partition key
  "MessageId": "msg456",           // Sort key
  "Content": "Hello world",
  "Timestamp": 1614556800,
  "IsRead": false,
  "Tags": ["important", "personal"]
}

Firestore Data Model

Firestore uses a document-oriented model with collections:

Data is organized into collections of documents
Documents contain fields of various data types
Documents can contain nested objects and arrays
Collections can contain subcollections (hierarchical)
No enforced schema (each document can have different fields)
Maximum document size of 1MB

Firestore queries are structured around collections:

Get a document by ID
Query documents in a collection
Filter by field values (with some limitations)
Order results by specific fields
Real-time listeners on queries
No joins (must be implemented client-side)

Example Firestore document:

// Document: /users/user123/messages/msg456
{
  "content": "Hello world",
  "timestamp": Timestamp(1614556800),
  "isRead": false,
  "tags": ["important", "personal"],
  "sender": {
    "name": "John Doe",
    "avatar": "https://example.com/avatar.jpg"
  }
}

The hierarchical structure in Firestore allows for intuitive organization of related data (e.g., a user’s messages as a subcollection).

Real-time Capabilities & Client Integration

DynamoDB Real-time Capabilities

DynamoDB wasn’t originally designed for real-time client updates but offers:

DynamoDB Streams for capturing changes
Integration with AWS Lambda for processing changes
WebSockets (via API Gateway) for pushing updates to clients

Implementing real-time features with DynamoDB typically requires:

Enable DynamoDB Streams
Create Lambda functions to process stream events
Set up WebSocket API in API Gateway
Build client-side code to connect to WebSockets

This architecture works but requires significant setup and maintenance.

Firestore Real-time Capabilities

Firestore provides built-in real-time capabilities:

Native listeners in all client SDKs
Automatic data synchronization to clients
Efficient delta updates (only changed data is sent)
Offline data access and write queuing
Automatic conflict resolution

Implementing real-time features with Firestore is straightforward:

// Web client example
db.collection('rooms').doc('roomA')
  .onSnapshot((doc) => {
    console.log('Room updated:', doc.data());
    // Update UI with new data
  });

This simplicity makes Firestore particularly well-suited for collaborative and real-time applications.

Security Models

DynamoDB Security

DynamoDB security is primarily based on AWS IAM:

Access controlled by IAM policies
Fine-grained permissions at the API action level
VPC endpoints for network isolation
Client-side and server-side encryption
No built-in row-level security (must be implemented in application code)

Security rules must be enforced by your application code or API layer, as DynamoDB doesn’t provide document-level security out of the box.

Firestore Security

Firestore security uses Firebase Security Rules:

Declarative rules language
Document-level access control
Rules based on authentication state
Rules that can reference other documents
Client-side enforcement without a server

Example Firestore security rules:

service cloud.firestore {
  match /databases/{database}/documents {
    // Only authenticated users can read public data
    match /public/{document=**} {
      allow read: if request.auth != null;
    }
    
    // Users can only read and write their own data
    match /users/{userId} {
      allow read, write: if request.auth.uid == userId;
    }
  }
}

This security model enables direct client-to-database access patterns while maintaining security.

Offline Support & Mobile Integration

DynamoDB Offline Support

DynamoDB does not provide native offline capabilities:

No built-in client-side caching
No automatic sync when connection is restored
Requires custom implementation for offline support
AWS Amplify library provides some helpers but still needs configuration

Firestore Offline Support

Firestore excels with offline capabilities:

Automatic client-side data caching
Offline reads from cache
Offline writes queued for synchronization
Automatic conflict resolution when reconnected
Works seamlessly on web and mobile platforms

This built-in offline support makes Firestore particularly valuable for mobile applications where network connectivity may be intermittent.

Performance & Scalability

Familiar with these Dynamodb Challenges ?

Writing one‑off scripts for simple DynamoDB operations
Constantly switching between AWS profiles and regions
Sharing and managing database operations with your team

You should try Dynomate GUI Client for DynamoDB

Create collections of operations that work together like scripts
Seamless integration with AWS SSO and profile switching
Local‑first design with Git‑friendly sharing for team collaboration

Download Free Trial Compare GUI Clients

DynamoDB Performance

DynamoDB delivers predictable, consistent performance:

Single-digit millisecond latency at any scale
Automatic scaling of throughput
No practical limits on table size
Predictable performance regardless of data growth
Throughput limited by provisioned capacity or on-demand limits

Firestore Performance

Firestore also offers strong performance characteristics:

Low latency for document operations
Automatic scaling with no capacity planning
Document count limits within collections (1 million documents per query)
Limited by 500 writes per second to a document
Better query flexibility at the cost of some performance constraints

Both databases scale automatically, but they have different performance characteristics and limits that may impact very high-throughput applications.

Pricing Models

DynamoDB Pricing

DynamoDB offers two pricing models:

Provisioned Capacity:
- Pay for reserved read/write capacity units
- More cost-effective for predictable workloads
- Requires capacity planning
- Options for reserved capacity for further discounts
On-Demand Capacity:
- Pay per request
- No capacity planning needed
- More expensive per operation
- Great for variable or unpredictable workloads

Additional costs include:

Storage (per GB-month)
Data transfer out
Global Tables replication
Backups and streams

Firestore Pricing

Firestore uses an operations-based pricing model:

Pay per document read, write, and delete
Storage costs per GB-month
Network egress charges
No capacity planning required
Different rates for different locations

Firestore can be more expensive for high-read applications but might be more cost-effective for applications with moderate usage patterns due to the lack of minimum capacity requirements.

Ecosystem & Integration

DynamoDB Ecosystem

DynamoDB integrates tightly with AWS services:

AWS Lambda for serverless computing
API Gateway for REST and WebSocket APIs
CloudWatch for monitoring and alerts
IAM for access control
S3 for large object storage
Kinesis for stream processing

For enhanced management capabilities, you can use third-party tools like Dynomate, which provides visual data exploration, query building, and performance optimization features.

Firestore Ecosystem

Firestore is deeply integrated with Google Cloud and Firebase:

Firebase Authentication for user management
Cloud Functions for serverless computing
Firebase Hosting for web content
Firebase Storage for large files
Google Cloud Identity Platform
Firebase Analytics for user behavior

This tight integration makes Firebase/Firestore particularly compelling for developers building consumer applications with authentication and real-time requirements.

Use Cases: When to Choose Each Database

Ideal Use Cases for DynamoDB

DynamoDB is often the better choice for:

Backend services with predictable access patterns:
- Microservices architectures
- API backends with server-side rendering
- Applications with well-defined key-based access
High-throughput applications:
- IoT data ingestion
- High-volume transactional systems
- Event processing systems
AWS-centric architectures:
- Teams already invested in AWS ecosystem
- Applications using multiple AWS services
- Organizations with AWS enterprise agreements

Ideal Use Cases for Firestore

Firestore shines in these scenarios:

Client-heavy applications with direct database access:
- Single page applications (SPAs)
- Mobile apps with offline requirements
- Progressive web apps
Real-time collaborative applications:
- Chat applications
- Collaborative editing
- Live dashboards
- Multiplayer games
Applications requiring minimal backend code:
- Rapid prototyping
- Startup MVPs
- Applications where backend complexity should be minimized

Migration Considerations

If you’re considering migrating between these databases:

DynamoDB to Firestore Migration

Challenges include:

Restructuring data for hierarchical collections
Implementing Firestore security rules
Adapting to different query capabilities
Moving from server-side to client-side focus

Firestore to DynamoDB Migration

Challenges include:

Flattening hierarchical data
Creating appropriate partition/sort keys
Implementing server-side security
Building real-time sync infrastructure
Managing offline capabilities

Development Experience & Tools

DynamoDB Developer Experience

DynamoDB development typically involves:

AWS Console for table management
AWS CLI for operations
AWS SDKs for programmatic access
NoSQL Workbench for visual design
CloudWatch for monitoring

Third-party tools like Dynomate enhance the developer experience with:

Intuitive visual interfaces
Multi-account support
Advanced query building
Schema visualization
Performance optimization

Firestore Developer Experience

Firestore offers a developer-friendly experience:

Firebase Console for data browsing and editing
Firebase Emulator Suite for local development
Firebase Extensions for common patterns
React/Angular/Vue integrations
Strong typing via libraries like firebase-admin

Conclusion: Making Your Decision

Switching from Dynobase? Try Dynomate

Developers are switching to Dynomate for these key advantages:

Better Multi-Profile Support

Native AWS SSO integration
Seamless profile switching
Multiple accounts in a single view

Developer-Focused Workflow

Script-like operation collections
Chain data between operations
Full AWS API logging for debugging

Team Collaboration

Git-friendly collection sharing
No account required for installation
Local-first data storage for privacy

Privacy & Security

No account creation required
100% local data storage
No telemetry or usage tracking

Try Dynomate Free for 7 Days Dynomate vs. Dynobase

The choice between DynamoDB and Firestore often comes down to:

Cloud platform preference: If you’re already committed to AWS or Google Cloud, staying within the ecosystem typically provides better integration.
Application architecture: Server-centric applications align better with DynamoDB, while client-heavy applications often benefit from Firestore’s real-time capabilities.
Real-time requirements: If real-time updates are central to your application, Firestore offers significant advantages with its built-in listeners and synchronization.
Offline capabilities: For mobile applications requiring offline support, Firestore’s built-in offline capabilities provide substantial development savings.
Security model: Firestore’s declarative security rules enable direct client access patterns that would be challenging to secure with DynamoDB.
Pricing structure: For applications with unpredictable or bursty traffic, analyze both pricing models to determine which is more cost-effective for your specific usage patterns.

Both DynamoDB and Firestore are excellent NoSQL databases that can scale to meet the needs of most applications. By understanding their different strengths and design philosophies, you can choose the database that best aligns with your application architecture, development team, and business requirements.

For teams that choose DynamoDB, specialized tools like Dynomate can significantly improve productivity by providing intuitive interfaces for managing your database, optimizing performance, and visualizing data structures.